Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement
International Computer Science and Engineering Society (ICSES) and its Journals have adopted the policy of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). On this basis, we are adhered and follows the COPE Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors and the Code of Conduct for Journal Publishers.

A selection of key points is included in the following; however, you should refer to the aforementioned documents for full details.

Corresponding Author's Duty

By submitting the manuscript to this publication, the corresponding Author verifies that:

1- The manuscript is original, and has not been partially or completely published elsewhere.

2- The manuscript is not under the evaluation elsewhere, since simultaneous submission is prohibited.

3- The consent of all the Authors has already been gained before the submission.

4- The consent of all the Sponsors has already been gained before the submission.

5- The manuscript has not any plagiarism.

6- All the necessary copyrights for the contents have already been acquired by the Authors.

7- All the results in the manuscript are exact and correct, and have not generated or manipulated.

8- Authors should ensure that they have properly acknowledged the work of others, and should also cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

9- All the fees based on the services the authors use, or charges they faced should be paid and cleared just on time, where unjustifiable neglect or delay of payment causes severe administrative problems for publisher, and is instance of violation in publication ethics.


Every person who has a shared beneficiary with you, such as some of your Colleagues, your Friends, your Family, your Professors, your Students, etc., has “Conflict-of-Interest” with you so that:

1- Authors should not select anyone with conflict-of-interest as his/her Potential Reviewer, Editor, etc.

2- Editors and Reviewers should not accept editoring and reviewing of manuscripts that have any conflict-of-interest with one of the Authors or their Affiliations.

Independence and Fair-play

Editor-in-Chief, Editors, and Reviewers evaluate submitted manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit (importance, originality, study’s validity, clarity) and its relevance to the journal’s aimss and cope, without regard to the authors’ race, gender, sexual orientation, ethnic origin, citizenship, religious belief, political philosophy, institutional affiliation, policies of governments or any other agencies outside of the journal itself.

Confidentiality and Disclosure

Editors and editorial staff will not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Handling Unethical Publishing Behaviour

In cases of alleged or proven scientific misconduct, fraudulent publication or plagiarism, the publisher, in close collaboration with the editors, will take all appropriate measures to clarify the situation and to amend the article in question. This includes the prompt publication of an erratum, clarification or, in the most severe case, the retraction of the affected work. The publisher, together with the editors, shall take reasonable steps to identify and prevent the publication of papers where research misconduct has occurred, and under no circumstances encourage such misconduct or knowingly allow such misconduct to take place.